Since the development is costly and
calls for considerable liaison between manufacturers, and since the present
components are generally adequate for normal single panel projection, it is
inconceivable that manufacturers will undertake the required developments on
their own initiative.
The light distribution in the printers is not perfect, but
are actually of only slight concern at this time. The contact step printer, if
used for making color intermediates on 5253 will automatically almost
completely compensate for its own very slight field irregularities. In the
continuous printer there is a side to side variation in exposure such that the center
transmits about 30% less light than the edges. Note that this is a true
side to center variation; this printer knows nothing about corners of the frames
so to speak (Fig. 4). This effect, typical of the illumination system in the
printer, actually compensates in part for the side to center deficiencies of
camera and projector, making the horizon level of the panels more constant in
brightness, and reducing the scallop effect. Compare Figs. 1 and 5.
It is also possible that one side may receive more exposure
than the other. This is not serious in our case because use of the mirrors in
the projectors results in a “flop over” of the side panel so that the heavy
side of one panel is blended into the heavy side of the adjacent panel. (Fig.
6).
In comparing the contributions to distribution and color
errors within a single panel, it is seen that the camera lens contributes most
to illumination error, the projector system next and the printer least. The
printer somewhat compensating it need not be considered until the total
contribution of camera lens and projector system is reduced by a very
considerable margin.
|